Protecting Social Security
Social Security is the foundation of America’s retirement security. It also provides critical financial protection for survivors of deceased workers and for disabled workers and their families. Two-thirds of older Americans rely on Social Security for half or more of their income.
Social Security is just that – secure. It has a number of key elements that no private program can provide.
• Social Security is a universal program that provides coverage for roughly 96 percent of working Americans. With the rapid and steady decline of private pension plans, it is even more crucial that Social Security be preserved and strengthened.
• Social Security is portable and its pension credits can be moved from employer to employer without a worker losing retirement benefits.
• Social Security has a built-in automatic indexing component that protects workers from inflation.
• Unlike private accounts, Social Security has been shown to be highly reliable. In the 70-plus year history of Social Security, it has never failed to pay benefits to those who are entitled to them. It has not been subject to the ups and downs of the stock market.
• Social Security uses a benefit formula that returns relatively higher benefits to low-wage earners, and goes a long way toward helping all Americans have adequate retirement income.
• Social Security has delivered a broad range of retirement, disability and survivors’ benefits to millions of people for decades at astonishingly low levels of administrative costs - about 1 cent of every dollar spent for benefits.
• Social Security is not an investment plan, but a system of social insurance providing income protection for families for retirement and in the event of disability or death.
In the 109th Congress, the UAW and a broad coalition of progressive groups were successful in stopping President Bush and GOP congressional leaders from privatizing Social Security. The GOP privatization proposals would have diverted a portion of workers’ payroll taxes that now finance the Social Security system into individual accounts. As a result, Social Security benefits would have been cut by 46 percent for some workers. Workers would not have been guaranteed the same lifetime, inflation protected retirement, disability and survivor benefits. Instead, they would have had to rely on the assets in their individual accounts, which could fluctuate dramatically with changes in the stock market. Fortunately, now that the Democrats control the White House and Congress, we are in a better position to stop dangerous privatization proposals and instead advance reforms to strengthen Social Security.
Every year the Social Security trustees report on the financial health of the program. Social Security still takes in more than it pays out, adding to the Social Security surplus reserve that, by law, is invested in interest-bearing U.S. government securities. In 2008, the Social Security Board of Trustees released the 68th annual report on Social Security’s financial status. The report projects that Social Security’s trust fund reserves will be exhausted in 2041, the same as projected last year. However, ongoing payroll tax revenue will still allow Social Security to pay 78 percent of full benefits after that (compared with 75 percent under last year’s projections).
This latest report shows that Social Security faces a significant but manageable challenge. Acting sooner rather than later will help reduce the size of the eventual adjustments. But the trustees’ report indicates that Social Security does not face a deep structural crisis requiring drastic changes. This long-term challenge can easily be addressed by minor changes in the financing of the program. There is no need to undermine Social Security’s basic structure through risky privatization schemes.
There are a number of ways to strengthen Social Security. For example, funds could be provided from general revenues. This could be paid for by eliminating part of the Bush tax cuts for the rich. The savings from eliminating the tax cuts for the top 1 percent of Americans, those currently making more than $400,000, is nearly as large as the estimate of the 75-year Social Security shortfall. Requiring upper-income individuals to pay Social Security taxes on their entire wages could also strengthen Social Security and make the system more progressive. Shortfalls in the system could also be addressed by requiring foreign companies that sell products in the United States to pay taxes to support Social Security, just like domestic companies.
Action
• Tell Congress to support measures to strengthen the financing base for the Social Security system by providing for an infusion of general revenues, lifting the cap on the payroll tax for higher income workers, and requiring foreign companies that sell products in the U.S. to pay taxes to support Social Security.

